JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 22, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Francisco Luis Giraldo Morales Vs. Intendencia Regional De Manizales De La Superintendencia De Sociedades

✓
Topic · hard data
Conlficto De Competencia Suscitado Entre El Juzgado Penal Del Circuito Especializado De Manizales Y El Juzgado Primero Administrativo De Pereira. Se Resolvió Remitir El Expediente De La Referencia Al Juzgado Penal Del Circuito Especializado De Manizales Para Que Resuelva La Acción De Que Se Trata
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Competencia de Juez Penal del Circuito Especializado
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. REMITIR, por intermedio de Secretaria General, el expediente de la referencia al Juzgado Penal del Circuito Especializado de Manizales, para que ejerciendo sus competencias constitucionales y legales, resuelva la accion de tutela de Francisco Luis Giraldo Morales contra la Intendencia Regional de Manizales de la Superintendencia de Sociedades.
  2. Segundo. COMUNICAR, por medio de Secretaria General, el presente auto al Juzgado
  3. Primero. Administrativo de Pereira, con el fin de que tenga conocimiento sobre lo aqui resuelto por la Corte Constitucional. Para el efecto se remitira copia de la presente providencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.